Pyongyang, September 22 (KCNA) -- Bandow, senior fellow of the Cato Research Institute of the U.S., one of the major policy institutes in the U.S., released an article accusing the present administration's DPRK policy.
In the article he said north Korea, a nuclear weapons state, would
not be as foolish to scrap nuclear weapons as Libya, adding Obama's
dream to apply the mode of nuclear negotiations with Iran to north Korea
turned out to be a pipedream.
A researcher of the Center for New American Security who worked at
the room of the U.S. Defense secretary earlier this year submitted a
written testimony which said that the aim to deter north Korea's
possession of nukes failed to a hearing of the International Relations
Committee of the U.S. House of Representatives, stunning politicians.
As the reality shows, the U.S. administration's policy to stifle the
DPRK has become the target of derision, scorn and contempt.
In fact, it is rare to find in the history of imperialist aggression
such a policy for stifling other countries whose contents have been
updated to be harsher with the passage of time as the U.S. hostile
policy toward the DPRK.
The U.S. poured huge political, economic and military resources into
the operations for seizing the Korean Peninsula, a strategic stronghold
for dominating the Asia-Pacific region.
Such policy might work to a certain extent on other countries but in
case of the DPRK, a country with a small territory and population, it
has always met a bitter fiasco.
The U.S. sustained a heavy defeat in the Korean war and was
compelled to submit a series of papers of surrender to the DPRK in the
subsequent period and Washington pushed it to having access to nuclear
deterrence. Consequently, it is oppressed by a nightmare.
The war deterrent of the DPRK has grown so strong as to be capable
of reacting to any mode of war desired by the U.S. This made the policy
of aggression pursued by the chieftain of imperialism unworkable in the
It is precisely for this reason that the U.S. hostile policy toward the DPRK is called an anachronistic and bankrupt policy.
Irony is that the U.S. high-ranking politicians, still pinning hope
on it, are fooling around to force the DPRK to disarm itself while
talking about the mode of nuclear negotiations with Iran.
They are so miserable as to go reckless, failing to face up to the
reality in which the structure of the DPRK-U.S. confrontation has
undergone a dramatic change.
The DPRK's nuclear deterrence can never be a bargaining chip on a
negotiating table as it is an indispensable means for defending the
country's sovereignty and the right to existence from the U.S.
decade-old nuclear threat and hostile policy toward the DPRK.
It is thanks to the Songun politics of the great Workers' Party of
Korea that the DPRK could increase the capabilities for self-defence
with a main emphasis on a nuclear force while foiling the enemies'
aggression moves in the biggest hotspot of the world.
The army and people of the DPRK will keep holding aloft the banner
of Songun that has recorded only victories and glory and the U.S. can
never realize its hostile policy toward the DPRK.
Those keen on the anachronistic waste are consigned to the garbage ground of history only. -0