Pyongyang,
May 10 (KCNA) -- A spokesman for the Committee for the Peaceful
Reunification of Korea (CPRK) gave an answer to a question put by KCNA
Friday as regards the anti-DPRK remarks made by the chief executive of
south Korea during her first visit to her master U.S. after taking
office. He said:
The present chief executive of south Korea during her trip kept herself busy holding "summit talks", a "joint press conference" and making an "address at Congress".
Her junket to the U.S. was nothing but a despicable sycophantic trip to please her master, confirm the master-servant relations, tighten the nexus against the DPRK and escalate the confrontation with fellow countrymen.
Her American master praised her to the sky, bringing to light his intention to use her as a head of a shock brigade in carrying out the U.S. Korea policy and Asia strategy for aggression and she for her part tried hard to court the pleasure of her master, fully revealing her confrontation nature.
It was disgusting, indeed, that she and her master spoke volumes about "comprehensive strategic alliance", "blood ties" and "core axis".
She let loose a spate of venomous remarks about "dismantlement of nukes", "provocation" and "reward" while toeing the U.S. hostile policy the DPRK and backing its moves for aggression against the DPRK only to spark off ridicule and disillusion among all people.
She slandered the DPRK's line on simultaneously pushing forward economic construction and the building of nuclear force, in particular, terming it "impossible goal" and the like. She did not hesitate to let loose a whole string of arrogant outbursts, talking about "change" whenever a chance presented itself.
Great irony is she is vocal that it was the biggest result of her U.S. junket that she advertised "confidence process on the Korean Peninsula" and Chongwadae garnered Washington's support for it.
She is not entitled to talk about "confidence" and the like as she malignantly slandered the social system and hurt the dignity of the DPRK and staged together with the U.S. madcap nuclear war maneuvers against the DPRK.
The south Korean chief executive did not hide that by "confidence process" she meant south Korea cannot tolerate the north's access to nukes, there can be no reward for its provocation and threat and it will be forced to pay a price for its provocation. This means her self-recognition of the fact that what she touted is the policy of confrontation, a new version of "nukes, opening and 3 000 dollars" advocated by traitor Lee Myung Bak.
Her recent U.S. junket was, in a nutshell, a disgusting meeting between the master and his servant aimed to strain the situation on the Korean Peninsula and in the region and a curtain-raiser to a dangerous war to invade the DPRK and carry out the strategy for dominating Asia.
It suggests a lot that the White House boss uttered he fully agreed with the mode of access proposed by her in her policy toward the north and it was very similar to his own.
She seems to calculate that she can maintain power, get protection and realize her ambition for the confrontation of the social systems if she relies on the U.S, but she would be well advised to think twice, not forgetting the lesson taught by her father who met a miserable end for such behavior.
We are following the present authorities in south Korea with patience. -0-
The present chief executive of south Korea during her trip kept herself busy holding "summit talks", a "joint press conference" and making an "address at Congress".
Her junket to the U.S. was nothing but a despicable sycophantic trip to please her master, confirm the master-servant relations, tighten the nexus against the DPRK and escalate the confrontation with fellow countrymen.
Her American master praised her to the sky, bringing to light his intention to use her as a head of a shock brigade in carrying out the U.S. Korea policy and Asia strategy for aggression and she for her part tried hard to court the pleasure of her master, fully revealing her confrontation nature.
It was disgusting, indeed, that she and her master spoke volumes about "comprehensive strategic alliance", "blood ties" and "core axis".
She let loose a spate of venomous remarks about "dismantlement of nukes", "provocation" and "reward" while toeing the U.S. hostile policy the DPRK and backing its moves for aggression against the DPRK only to spark off ridicule and disillusion among all people.
She slandered the DPRK's line on simultaneously pushing forward economic construction and the building of nuclear force, in particular, terming it "impossible goal" and the like. She did not hesitate to let loose a whole string of arrogant outbursts, talking about "change" whenever a chance presented itself.
Great irony is she is vocal that it was the biggest result of her U.S. junket that she advertised "confidence process on the Korean Peninsula" and Chongwadae garnered Washington's support for it.
She is not entitled to talk about "confidence" and the like as she malignantly slandered the social system and hurt the dignity of the DPRK and staged together with the U.S. madcap nuclear war maneuvers against the DPRK.
The south Korean chief executive did not hide that by "confidence process" she meant south Korea cannot tolerate the north's access to nukes, there can be no reward for its provocation and threat and it will be forced to pay a price for its provocation. This means her self-recognition of the fact that what she touted is the policy of confrontation, a new version of "nukes, opening and 3 000 dollars" advocated by traitor Lee Myung Bak.
Her recent U.S. junket was, in a nutshell, a disgusting meeting between the master and his servant aimed to strain the situation on the Korean Peninsula and in the region and a curtain-raiser to a dangerous war to invade the DPRK and carry out the strategy for dominating Asia.
It suggests a lot that the White House boss uttered he fully agreed with the mode of access proposed by her in her policy toward the north and it was very similar to his own.
She seems to calculate that she can maintain power, get protection and realize her ambition for the confrontation of the social systems if she relies on the U.S, but she would be well advised to think twice, not forgetting the lesson taught by her father who met a miserable end for such behavior.
We are following the present authorities in south Korea with patience. -0-
No comments:
Post a Comment