Juche and postcolonial theory are two theories which stemmed from the will against domination. On the surface, they seem to be similar, but they differ in many ways such as how they define liberation, subjectivity, and historical agency. Although both theories criticise the imperialist agenda and reject the idea that the Western way is the only way, they both differ in their overall goal. As Postcolonial theory seeks to reset the thinking about nation, identity, and authority. Juche asks to transform anti colonial struggle into a doctrine which centralised national sovereignty.
Juche begins from the idea that independence is paramount and is the foundation of human existence. Juche opposes colonialism as it destroys the history and autonomy of a nation. Under foreign domination, a nation not only suffers from the lack of economic autonomy but also ideological and national consciousness. The only way to restore this is through a liberation under a strong organised organisation. In this thinking, the nation is the main historical subject. The revolutionary tendency of Juche is the mechanism through which collective consciousness can be made under a strong leadership. A leadership that can guide the people forward, in one voice, in solidarity.
Postcolonial theory approaches colonialism differently. Postcolonial theory is more mainstream and regarded as one of the most influential theories in politics, philosophy, and international relations. In this tradition, colonialism is understood as a system that influences language, identity, desire, etc. The colonised subject lack a unified national consciousness and therefore lack national identity. It is in this way that postcolonial theory is often skeptic of a solid-state identity. In a way, postcolonial thinkers believe that nationalism can be reproduce through the same structure of exclusion and authority that colonialism imposed.
However, Juche rejects this doubt. Juche insists on clear and united ideological clarity. It argues that the people are yearning for liberation, but they lack the right leadership to lead them. A leadership is needed to guide and open a way for the people to follow toward liberation. When the people are united, under the right leadership, they are one. They become a collective historical force. Juche seeks total integration of the people into the political community. This is different to postcolonial theory.
The way both theories treat culture is also noticeable. Postcolonial thinkers usually argue that colonialism produces cultural hybridity. Colonised societies, in postcolonial perspectives, absorb and integrate imperial influence into their own society. It views culture as something that is always changing, fluid, and can be a subject of manipulation and negotiation. Juche opposes this thinking almost completely. Juche views the hybridity of culture as weakness and contamination to national identity and ideology. It sees foreign influence as weapon, a threat to the state, a virus to national autonomy because dependence on external cultural forms can undermine local culture and political consciousness. Foreign influence on local national culture is an insult to not only the people, but to the heroes who sacrificed their blood to the motherland/fatherland.
The two theories have opposing views on power. While postcolonial theory sees domination spreading through dialogue and institutes, Juche tries to centralise the power instead. Liberation requires concentrated power, to mobilise the masses, to put forward what is to be done. Fragmentation is weak. Fragmentation means weak union and this opens for a possibility of external interference. Therefore, in Juche, the leadership is indispensable and must be protected at all costs. This structure is treated as the condition of true independence. Juche rejects Western universalism. It replaces this with national particularism. Each people must determine its own path according to each unique condition. This philosophy is important to understanding Juche. Extrapolate this and it would result in a theory that concerns with state power, national identity, than internationalism and globalisation.
Ultimately, postcolonial theory treats identity as unstable and contested. It views identity as historically produced by the dominators. Juche, in contrast, treats identity as something that is paramount and must be protected through the political organisation. Although both arises from anti-imperialist thoughts, one moves more toward multiplicity and criticisms, while the other moves toward national unity and state sovereignty.
Kimlong Ly
Assistant Researcher, British Study Group for the Study of the Juche Idea







.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)