Pyongyang, July 6 (KCNA) -- A spokesman for the Institute for American
Studies of the Foreign Ministry of the DPRK gave the following answer on
Wednesday to the question raised by KCNA as regards the claim being
floated in the U.S. that "third offset strategy" should be applied to
the Korean peninsula:
Former officials and experts on East Asian affairs of the U.S. at a
recent seminar held at Georgetown University reportedly asserted that
"third offset strategy" should be applied to the Korean peninsula as
muscle-flexing like joint military drills and introduction of strategic
bombers can not thwart the "nuclear and missile threat" coming from the
DPRK.
The "third offset strategy" advanced by the U.S. military in 2014
calls for modernizing weaponry to the maximum and increasing the cyber
and electronic warfare capability by introducing ultra-modern military
technology and thus rounding off a combined operational commanding
system to cope with the moves being stepped up by other big powers to
develop their ultra-modern weapons.
The above-said claim is a manifestation of the extreme hostile moves
of the U.S. to stifle the DPRK by mobilizing not only conventional and
nuclear forces but also ultra-modern war hardware, and a revelation of
its ill-minded purpose to get undisguised in its moves to maintain its
military edge in Northeast Asia under the pretext of the "threat" from
the DPRK.
The DPRK is fully capable of making any strategy of the U.S. go
belly-up determinedly, to say nothing of the "third offset strategy."
The U.S. is crying out for countering the "nuclear and missile
threat" from the DPRK but it is just the U.S. which has escalated the
danger of war through ceaseless arms buildup and war drills on the
Korean peninsula and in its vicinity.
If the U.S. does not want to meet its miserable end in the all-out
confrontation with the DPRK, it should make a serious choice, clearly
understanding the latter's strategic position and facing up to the
change of the times. -0-
No comments:
Post a Comment